In House Legal Risk Pricerflagship
The Problem: Legal risk at tech companies is usually delivered in narrative form, "this is risky, consider mitigations," which leaves business teams without the quantified inputs they need to weigh legal exposure against product value. Product managers and executives asking "should we launch this feature?" get qualitative hedging where they need dollar ranges, probabilities, and comparables. Meanwhile, the research required to price a risk accurately (settlement history, AG and federal enforcement patterns, pending legislation, peer company outcomes, political climate) is scattered across dozens of repositories and typically compressed into one lawyer's gut read. The Tool: The Legal Risk Pricer is a multi-agent orchestrator that turns a scenario (a feature, policy, contract position, or regulatory change) into a quantified risk assessment non-lawyers can act on. It runs a three-layer intake to build a confirmed Research Brief, then deploys six parallel research subagents against mandatory repositories (settlements, state AGs, federal enforcers, state legislation, industry news, and comparable companies), consolidates their findings into a dossier, and feeds it to a dedicated scoring agent that produces structured JSON across four dimensions (vulnerability, damage magnitude, enforcement likelihood, asymmetry) and three complementary formulas (expected value, structural exposure, severity × likelihood). A mandatory QA agent audits for arithmetic errors, hallucinated citations, and framing before the orchestrator assembles a Slack-ready summary, an interactive HTML report with mitigation modeling and enforcer cascades, and a persistent risk register for portfolio-level comparison, giving business teams the same kind of pricing rigor finance applies to capital allocation.