Loading…

Lawyer/Builder
I entered law at a young age, so I never approached the profession in purely traditional terms. From early on, my thinking was naturally systems-oriented and, to an extent, technology-oriented. My legal practice in Ontario exposed me to how much value is lost through fragmented workflows, avoidable friction, and poor process design, especially in high-stakes matters. That pushed me toward building. I became interested in legal analysis, and in how legal reasoning can be translated into tools, workflows, and operating systems that are repeatable, efficient, and usable in the real world. What draws me to this space is the ability to turn legal judgment into structure. I care about designing better outputs and speeding up existing tasks. My current work sits at the intersection of law, operations, and product thinking, and I am especially interested in using AI and system design to reduce friction, improve trust, and create an edge inside legal and adjacent workflows. I see LegalQuants as a community for lawyers who are not content to consume tools passively, but want to build, test, and shape what legal work becomes.

Matter Triage is a litigation matter intelligence, deadline extraction, and document reasoning platform I built to help lawyers turn large volumes of case documents into structured, usable matter data. Lawyers can upload PDFs, Word documents, text files, or entire folders, and the system automatically ingests, stores, OCR-processes where necessary, chunks, embeds, and analyzes the file set in the background, including at bulk scale with parallel upload and processing, retry handling, status tracking, and support for very large document volumes. Once uploaded, documents can be organized into individual matters so that each lawsuit or file becomes a unified working record rather than a loose collection of documents. From there, the platform uses LLM-powered extraction to classify document type, identify jurisdictional signals, extract parties and roles, capture document dates, key events, and neutral summaries, and, most importantly, detect deadlines with structured fields including deadline type, date expression, triggering event, responsible party, consequence if missed, confidence level, and citations. It also includes a citation-grounded RAG chat layer that allows a lawyer to ask practical questions such as who the parties are, what deadlines exist, what happened on a particular date, or what the major issues are, with strict file and page citations, source quotes, coverage tracking, and a documented fallback when an answer is not found in the record. On the review side, the platform gives the user a Matter Index view, a Deadlines table, a Timeline view, matter-level filtering, source inspection, reviewed-deadline tracking, and CSV or JSON export so that extracted legal information can be reviewed, verified, and used downstream. Technically, it is built with React 19, Tailwind CSS 4, tRPC, Express.js, vector embeddings, MySQL, S3 storage, and a modern batch-processing architecture designed for real litigation workflow rather than simple document summarization. What makes the product valuable is that it is not just a chat interface over files - it is a litigation triage and matter intelligence engine built around traceability, structure, and legal usefulness. The broader vision is to build on this foundation into full document automation driven by extracted key facts, workflow generation based on what the system learns from matter patterns, contradiction detection across records, stronger citation verification, and privacy-preserving local LLM deployment so a lawyer can run an intelligent chat and workflow layer locally on any file or matter without sacrificing confidentiality. In that sense, Matter Triage is the beginning of a much larger legal operating system: one that starts with document triage and deadline intelligence, but can expand into drafting, automation, private matter analysis, and end-to-end legal workflow creation.
I believe technology matters because it allows structure to scale. Any important human process that remains unnecessarily manual, opaque, repetitive, or fragile is a candidate for redesign. I see technology as an instrument of leverage - a way to turn judgment into systems, and systems into repeatable value. That is what draws me to legal technology, workflow design, automation, document intelligence, and product thinking. It is a consequence of how I think.